But Bolton’s book, slated to be released next week, accomplished something impeachment could not: bipartisan agreement to condemn Trump’s former national security adviser.
Republicans attacked Bolton’s credibility and accused him of settling scores. Democrats said it was too little, too late after Bolton refused to testify during the impeachment inquiry.
“Bolton may be an author, but he’s no patriot,” tweeted House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who led the House’s impeachment inquiry, adding that Bolton “saved it for a book” instead of testifying.
The congressional reaction to Bolton’s book, “The Room Where it Happened,” underscores the political reality the Republican hawk now faces after writing a White House tell-all following his 17 months in the Trump White House.
In the book, Bolton writes that in an August meeting, Bolton said he asked Trump about the status of the US security aid to Ukraine. “He said he wasn’t in favor of sending them anything until all the Russia-investigation materials related to Clinton and Biden had been turned over,” Bolton writes.
The former national security adviser says that Trump also pressed Chinese President Xi Jinping to help with his 2020 bid, writing that Trump “stressed the importance of farmers and increased Chinese purchases of soybeans and wheat in the electoral outcome.”
Bolton was a key figure in many of the major events House investigators unearthed during their impeachment inquiry, and his testimony was sought by Democrats in both the House and Senate.
Reports that Bolton’s manuscript included allegations Trump had tied the Ukraine aid to Kiev investigating former vice President Joe Biden only fueled Democrats’ efforts to call Bolton, but Senate Republicans voted against hearing from Bolton or anyone else, before moving to acquit Trump.
Now those events hotly debated months ago are coming back to the forefront with the release of Bolton’s book, and the Trump administration’s suit against Bolton’s book.
Republicans responded Wednesday by attacking Bolton’s credibility. “Bolton’s got an ax to grind,” said Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, a key Trump defender during the impeachment proceedings, adding the reports were “ridiculous.”
Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, said Bolton was “not really” credible.
“There’s clearly some animus here towards the President. I think that’s pretty apparent on both sides,” Hawley said. “I just think that there’s a lot of desire for publicity here. … I think you’ve got to take this with a grain of salt.”
But Bolton’s allegations were no rallying point for Democrats in Congress, although several congressional Democrats said they planned to investigate the accusations he was making related to China.
House Democrats in particular were aggrieved that Bolton would not appear during their impeachment inquiry, when numerous administration officials defied the Trump administration’s demand not to testify after receiving subpoenas.
“It is curious to all of us that he wasn’t willing to say this stuff to Congress, but he’s willing to say it when he can make money,” Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “I’m not suggesting that what he’s saying isn’t true. I’m just saying that you do have to question his motives.”
In the book, Bolton doesn’t answer the question of whether Trump should have been impeached for his conduct regarding Ukraine, though he said Trump’s actions with Ukraine were “deeply disturbing” and that he raised the alarm within the Trump administration.
Bolton blames House Democrats for being too fixated on the schedule with the Democratic presidential primary approaching, accusing them of playing “hysterical” games instead of running a serious investigation.
“If Trump deserved impeachment and conviction, the American public deserved a serious and thorough effort to justify the extraordinary punishment of removing an elected president from office,” Bolton wrote. “That did not happen.”
Bolton argued that even if he had been called to testify by the Senate, he is “convinced” that it would have made “no significant difference” to the outcome.
CNN’s Marshall Cohen, Ali Zaslav, Manu Raju and Lauren Fox contributed to this report.